Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    26 views1 page
    Richard Gregg Davis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the prison where he was incarcerated. The district court denied relief and dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision to deny relief and reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 91 F.3d 129 Docket: 96-6365

    Original Title

    Richard Gregg Davis v. J.B. Taylor, Warden Bobby W. Soles, Assistant Warden Barbara Wheeler, Head of Treatment Peggy Spicer A. Smith, Lieutenant, Security Staff J. Lyttle, Sergeant, Security Staff, 91 F.3d 129, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Richard Gregg Davis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the prison where he was incarcerated. The district court denied relief and dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision to deny relief and reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    26 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Gregg Davis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the prison where he was incarcerated. The district court denied relief and dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision to deny relief and reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    91 F.

    3d 129

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Richard Gregg DAVIS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    J.B. TAYLOR, Warden; Bobby W. Soles, Assistant Warden;
    Barbara Wheeler, Head of Treatment; Peggy Spicer; A.
    Smith, Lieutenant, Security Staff; J. Lyttle, Sergeant,
    Security Staff, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 96-6365.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: June 20, 1996
    Decided: July 9, 1996

    Richard Gregg Davis, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) (1988). We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Taylor,
    No. CA-95-1150-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like