Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Terry Lee McClain v. Department of The Navy J.T. Galbreath, PNC, Bydir, Oic, Dispersing Officer, 86 F.3d 1151, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from May 31, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Terry Lee McClain under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. While the district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the Court of Appeals affirms the dismissal on the grounds that the complaint, filed ten years after the cause of action accrued, was time-barred. The Court of Appeals dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-05-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 86 F.3d 1151 Docket: 95-8566

    Original Title

    Terry Lee McClain v. Department of the Navy J.T. Galbreath, Pnc, Bydir, Oic, Dispersing Officer, 86 F.3d 1151, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from May 31, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Terry Lee McClain under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. While the district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the Court of Appeals affirms the dismissal on the grounds that the complaint, filed ten years after the cause of action accrued, was time-barred. The Court of Appeals dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Terry Lee McClain v. Department of The Navy J.T. Galbreath, PNC, Bydir, Oic, Dispersing Officer, 86 F.3d 1151, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from May 31, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Terry Lee McClain under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. While the district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the Court of Appeals affirms the dismissal on the grounds that the complaint, filed ten years after the cause of action accrued, was time-barred. The Court of Appeals dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    86 F.

    3d 1151

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Terry Lee McCLAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; J.T. Galbreath, PNC,
    BYDIR, OIC,
    Dispersing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-8566.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 16, 1996.
    Decided: May 31, 1996.

    W.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95415-3-MU)
    Terry Lee McClain, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. However, we affirm the district court's
    dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) (1988) on the grounds that Appellant's
    complaint, filed ten years after the cause of action had accrued, is time-barred.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like