Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt, 86 F.3d 1154, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The document is an appeals court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Danny Alan Vestal, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Bill Clinton and James B. Hunt. The appeals court finds no reversible error in the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. It affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Vestal v. Clinton, No. CA-95-752 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-05-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 86 F.3d 1154 Docket: 96-6089

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an appeals court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Danny Alan Vestal, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Bill Clinton and James B. Hunt. The appeals court finds no reversible error in the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. It affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Vestal v. Clinton, No. CA-95-752 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Danny Alan Vestal v. Bill Clinton James B. Hunt, 86 F.3d 1154, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an appeals court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Danny Alan Vestal, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Bill Clinton and James B. Hunt. The appeals court finds no reversible error in the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. It affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Vestal v. Clinton, No. CA-95-752 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    86 F.

    3d 1154

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Danny Alan VESTAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Bill CLINTON; James B. Hunt, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-6089.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 16, 1996.
    Decided: May 21, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of
    North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95752)
    Danny Alan Vestal, Appellant Pro Se.
    M.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Vestal v. Clinton, No. CA-95-752 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like