Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Perez, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Angel Perez's motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. As the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented, the appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the lower court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7067

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Angel Perez's motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. As the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented, the appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views2 pages

    United States v. Perez, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Angel Perez's motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. As the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented, the appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7067

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JOSE ANGEL PEREZ, a/k/a Angel,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-93-26-F)
    Submitted:

    September 20, 1996

    Decided:

    October 2, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jose Angel Perez, Appellant Pro Se.
    John Douglas McCullough,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    Appellant's motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Perez, No. CR-93-26-F (E.D.N.C. May 23,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like