Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lindsey, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Tommy Lindsey appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in case numbers CR-93-53-7 and CA-96-939-F.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-11-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6751

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Tommy Lindsey appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in case numbers CR-93-53-7 and CA-96-939-F.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Lindsey, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case where Tommy Lindsey appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in case numbers CR-93-53-7 and CA-96-939-F.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6751

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    TOMMY LINDSEY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-93-53-7, CA-96-939-F)
    Submitted:

    October 21, 1997

    Decided:

    November 12, 1997

    Before HALL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tommy Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jackson, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Lindsey, Nos. CR-93-53-7; CA-96-939-F
    (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like