Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brinson v. United States, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Clinton Brinson's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appellate court denied Brinson's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-08-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6285

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Clinton Brinson's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appellate court denied Brinson's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Brinson v. United States, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Clinton Brinson's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appellate court denied Brinson's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6285

    CLINTON BRINSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
    (CR-96-197, CA-99-823-5-F)

    Submitted:

    July 25, 2000

    Decided:

    August 25, 2000

    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Clinton Brinson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Clinton Brinson seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny Brinsons

    motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. See Brinson v. United States, Nos. CR-96-197; CA-99-823-5-F
    (E.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like