Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Pully v. Tucker, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Richard Allen Pully, a Virginia inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. Pully appealed the district court's decision. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit found Pully's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed it, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying relief on the § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7402

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Richard Allen Pully, a Virginia inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. Pully appealed the district court's decision. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit found Pully's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed it, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying relief on the § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Pully v. Tucker, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Allen Pully, a Virginia inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. Pully appealed the district court's decision. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit found Pully's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed it, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying relief on the § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7402

    RICHARD ALLEN PULLY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Chairman of Virginia
    Parole Board,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-97-875-2)
    Submitted:

    December 11, 1997

    Decided:

    December 31, 1997

    Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard Allen Pully, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint under
    28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Pully v. Tucker, No. CA-97-875-2 (E.D. Va. Sept.
    26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like