Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Johnson v. North Carolina, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Wayne Thomas Johnson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services and the North Carolina Department of Corrections. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7488

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Wayne Thomas Johnson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services and the North Carolina Department of Corrections. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Johnson v. North Carolina, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Wayne Thomas Johnson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services and the North Carolina Department of Corrections. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7488

    WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Board Members,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-01-508-CT)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2001

    Decided:

    January 11, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Wayne Thomas Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Wayne T. Johnson appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court.

    Johnson v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal

    Servs., Inc., No. CA-01-508-CT (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2001).

    We dis-

    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like