Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Scott v. Swann, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    John T. Scott filed a § 1983 complaint against Doctor Swann in district court that was denied. Scott appealed. The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without hearing oral arguments, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Per curiam, unpublished opinions in the 4th Circuit are not binding precedent and the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for the court to make its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-02-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7715

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John T. Scott filed a § 1983 complaint against Doctor Swann in district court that was denied. Scott appealed. The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without hearing oral arguments, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Per curiam, unpublished opinions in the 4th Circuit are not binding precedent and the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for the court to make its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Scott v. Swann, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John T. Scott filed a § 1983 complaint against Doctor Swann in district court that was denied. Scott appealed. The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's denial without hearing oral arguments, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Per curiam, unpublished opinions in the 4th Circuit are not binding precedent and the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for the court to make its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7715

    JOHN T. SCOTT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR SWANN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-711-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    February 8, 2001

    Decided:

    February 15, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John T. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John T. Scott appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the districts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.
    13, 2000).

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    Scott v. Swann, No. CA-00-711-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like