Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Henry Alexander Crockett, 976 F.2d 727, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    40 views2 pages
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Henry Alexander Crockett's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Crockett's appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit cited the district court's opinion and reasoning in affirming its decision and found oral arguments were not necessary in making its ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-09-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 976 F.2d 727 Docket: 92-6563

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Henry Alexander Crockett's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Crockett's appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit cited the district court's opinion and reasoning in affirming its decision and found oral arguments were not necessary in making its ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    40 views2 pages

    United States v. Henry Alexander Crockett, 976 F.2d 727, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Henry Alexander Crockett's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding Crockett's appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit cited the district court's opinion and reasoning in affirming its decision and found oral arguments were not necessary in making its ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    976 F.

    2d 727

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Henry Alexander CROCKETT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 92-6563.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 10, 1992
    Decided: Sept. 16, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CR-85-328-H,
    CA-91-3327-H)
    Henry Alexander Crockett, Appellant Pro Se.
    Thomas Michael DiBiagio, Office of the United States Attorney,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    Henry Alexander Crockett appeals from the district court's order refusing relief

    under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Crockett, Nos. CR-85-328H, CA-91-3327-H (D. Md. Apr. 29, 1992). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like