Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael Riley Hodges v. Larry Conrad Burke, JR., 978 F.2d 1255, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    Michael Riley Hodges filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Larry Conrad Burke Jr. in district court which was denied. Hodges appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding Hodges' appeal had no merit based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-11-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 978 F.2d 1255 Docket: 92-6823

    Original Title

    Michael Riley Hodges v. Larry Conrad Burke, Jr., 978 F.2d 1255, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Riley Hodges filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Larry Conrad Burke Jr. in district court which was denied. Hodges appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding Hodges' appeal had no merit based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views2 pages

    Michael Riley Hodges v. Larry Conrad Burke, JR., 978 F.2d 1255, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Riley Hodges filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Larry Conrad Burke Jr. in district court which was denied. Hodges appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding Hodges' appeal had no merit based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    978 F.

    2d 1255

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Michael Riley HODGES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Larry Conrad BURKE, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 92-6823.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 26, 1992
    Decided: November 10, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-560R)
    Michael Riley Hodges, Appellant Pro Se.
    W.D.Va.
    Affirmed.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    Michael Riley Hodges appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on

    the reasoning of the district court. Hodges v. Burke, No. CA-92-560-R (W.D.
    Va. July 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like