Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William D. Crumble v. Ms. Baker, Parole Officer, 978 F.2d 1254, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from November 12, 1992. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to William D. Crumble under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Parole Officer Ms. Baker. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 5, 1992 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately represented in the materials available to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-11-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 978 F.2d 1254 Docket: 92-6863

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from November 12, 1992. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to William D. Crumble under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Parole Officer Ms. Baker. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 5, 1992 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately represented in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    William D. Crumble v. Ms. Baker, Parole Officer, 978 F.2d 1254, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from November 12, 1992. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to William D. Crumble under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Parole Officer Ms. Baker. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 5, 1992 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately represented in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    978 F.

    2d 1254

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William D. CRUMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Ms. BAKER, Parole Officer, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 92-6863.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 26, 1992
    Decided: November 12, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-2019-N)
    William D. Crumble, Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    Affirmed.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    William D. Crumble appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Crumble v. Baker, No. CA-92-2019-N (D.

    Md. Aug. 5, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like