Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • David Bright v. James N. Rollins, Warden John Sandstrom, 962 F.2d 6, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where David Bright filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against James N. Rollins and John Sandstrom. The district court denied relief to Bright and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Bright's appeal. The Fourth Circuit provided a per curiam opinion that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-05-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 962 F.2d 6 Docket: 92-6174

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where David Bright filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against James N. Rollins and John Sandstrom. The district court denied relief to Bright and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Bright's appeal. The Fourth Circuit provided a per curiam opinion that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    David Bright v. James N. Rollins, Warden John Sandstrom, 962 F.2d 6, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where David Bright filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against James N. Rollins and John Sandstrom. The district court denied relief to Bright and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Bright's appeal. The Fourth Circuit provided a per curiam opinion that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    962 F.

    2d 6

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    David BRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    James N. ROLLINS, Warden; John Sandstrom, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 92-6174.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 14, 1992
    Decided: May 21, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-2546-N)
    David Bright, Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    David Bright appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Bright v. Rollins, No. CA-91-2546-N (D. Md.

    Jan. 27, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like