Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Randy Clark, 962 F.2d 8, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    Randy Clark appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's reasoning as presented in its opinion dated July 3, 1991 for case numbers CR-89-250 and CA-91-165-3. As the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials, the Fourth Circuit decided oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-05-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 962 F.2d 8 Docket: 91-7665

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Randy Clark appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's reasoning as presented in its opinion dated July 3, 1991 for case numbers CR-89-250 and CA-91-165-3. As the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials, the Fourth Circuit decided oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    United States v. Randy Clark, 962 F.2d 8, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Randy Clark appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's reasoning as presented in its opinion dated July 3, 1991 for case numbers CR-89-250 and CA-91-165-3. As the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials, the Fourth Circuit decided oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    962 F.

    2d 8

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Randy CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 91-7665.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 4, 1992
    Decided: May 15, 1992

    Randy Clark, Appellant Pro Se.


    Sanford Benjamin Bryant, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington,
    West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    Randy Clark appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28
    U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Clark, No. CR-89-250, CA-91165-3 (S.D.W. Va. July 3, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like