Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Rowland Lovingood, 892 F.2d 75, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    Rowland Lovingood appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 23, 1989 decision in United States v. Lovingood. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 892 F.2d 75 Docket: 89-7730

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rowland Lovingood appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 23, 1989 decision in United States v. Lovingood. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    United States v. Rowland Lovingood, 892 F.2d 75, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rowland Lovingood appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 23, 1989 decision in United States v. Lovingood. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    892 F.

    2d 75

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Rowland LOVINGOOD, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 89-7730.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Sept. 21, 1989.
    Decided: Dec. 1, 1989.
    Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Dec. 22, 1989.

    Rowland Lovingood, appellant pro se.


    Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Rowland Lovingood appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under
    28 U.S.C. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lovingood, C/R 83-5-02-CR-9
    (E.D.N.C. June 23, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like