Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hilton-Bey v. US Patent & Trade, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Johnny Hilton-Bey filed a civil action alleging patent and trademark infringement against the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The district court dismissed the claims without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and determined that it did not have appellate jurisdiction over the district court's decision, citing 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1). As a result, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-11-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-1765

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Johnny Hilton-Bey filed a civil action alleging patent and trademark infringement against the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The district court dismissed the claims without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and determined that it did not have appellate jurisdiction over the district court's decision, citing 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1). As a result, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Hilton-Bey v. US Patent & Trade, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Johnny Hilton-Bey filed a civil action alleging patent and trademark infringement against the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The district court dismissed the claims without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and determined that it did not have appellate jurisdiction over the district court's decision, citing 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1). As a result, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-1765

    JOHNNY HILTON-BEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK
    Disclosure Document Program,

    OFFICE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-024218-AMD, CA-03-1102-AMD)

    Submitted:

    October 22, 2003

    Decided:

    November 10, 2003

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Johnny Hilton-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Johnny Hilton-Bey (Hilton) appeals from the dismissal of his
    civil action in which he alleged patent and trademark infringement
    against the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The district
    court dismissed Hiltons claims without prejudice for lack of
    subject matter jurisdiction. We have thoroughly reviewed the record
    in

    this

    matter

    and

    conclude

    that

    we

    are

    without

    appellate

    jurisdiction for the same reasons stated by the district court.


    See 28 U.S.C. 1295(a)(1)(2000).

    Accordingly, we dismiss the

    appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like