Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gregory Lee v. Eric Wilson, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Gregory Lamont Lee's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition and motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit granted Lee leave to proceed in forma pauperis but affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit stated it reviewed the record and adopted the reasons provided by the district court in its orders denying Lee relief and reconsideration.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-04-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7917

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Gregory Lamont Lee's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition and motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit granted Lee leave to proceed in forma pauperis but affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit stated it reviewed the record and adopted the reasons provided by the district court in its orders denying Lee relief and reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Gregory Lee v. Eric Wilson, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Gregory Lamont Lee's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition and motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit granted Lee leave to proceed in forma pauperis but affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit stated it reviewed the record and adopted the reasons provided by the district court in its orders denying Lee relief and reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7917

    GREGORY LAMONT LEE,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    ERIC D. WILSON,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Anthony John Trenga,
    District Judge. (1:11-cv-00981-AJT-JFA)

    Submitted:

    March 28, 2013

    Decided:

    April 9, 2013

    Before KEENAN, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gregory Lamont Lee, Appellant Pro Se.


    Kevin J. Mikolasheck,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory Lamont Lee, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241
    (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition and denying his motion for
    reconsideration.
    reversible

    We

    error.

    have

    reviewed

    Accordingly,

    the

    although

    record
    we

    and

    grant

    find

    no

    leave

    to

    proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.
    (E.D.

    Va.

    July

    26

    Lee v. Wilson, No. 1:11-cv-00981-AJT-JFA


    &

    Oct.

    2,

    2012).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like