Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Freeman v. Warner, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Napoleon Juan Freeman of a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Freeman's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons stated by the district court in its October 21, 2004 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-07-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7791

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Napoleon Juan Freeman of a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Freeman's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons stated by the district court in its October 21, 2004 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Freeman v. Warner, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Napoleon Juan Freeman of a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Freeman's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons stated by the district court in its October 21, 2004 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7791

    NEAPOLEON JUAN FREEMAN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARK WARNER, Governor; RONALD J. ANGELONE,
    Director, Department of Corrections; KALVIN
    LOVDA WEBB; MARCQUES JERMANE WHORLEY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CA-04-1196)

    Submitted:

    June 22, 2005

    Decided:

    July 28, 2005

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Neapoleon Juan Freeman, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Neapoleon Juan Freeman appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under
    28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find

    that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Freeman v.

    Warner, No. CA-04-1196 (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2004).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like