Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Quinn v. Pendergraph, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Vernon Lee Quinn filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various government officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Quinn appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Quinn's appeal to be frivolous. The appeals court therefore dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that denied Quinn's original complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-11-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6673

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Vernon Lee Quinn filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various government officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Quinn appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Quinn's appeal to be frivolous. The appeals court therefore dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that denied Quinn's original complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Quinn v. Pendergraph, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vernon Lee Quinn filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various government officials which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Quinn appealed the district court's denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found Quinn's appeal to be frivolous. The appeals court therefore dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that denied Quinn's original complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6673

    VERNON LEE QUINN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN DOE, Magistrate Judge, Mecklenburg County
    Jail; JIM PENDERGRAPH; W. DAVID LEE, Union
    County, Superior Court Judge; JOHN DOE,
    Classification, Mecklenburg County Jail; JOHN
    DOE, Clerk of Superior Court,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-05-126-MU-3)

    Submitted:

    September 28, 2005

    Decided:

    November 21, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Vernon Lee Quinn, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Vernon Lee Quinn appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
    U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find

    that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Quinn v. Pendergraph,

    No. CA-05-126-MU-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like