Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Crump, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Norvell Webster Crump's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-03-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7694

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Norvell Webster Crump's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Crump, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Norvell Webster Crump's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7694

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-94-101, CA-01-969)

    Submitted:

    February 4, 2003

    Decided:

    March 12, 2003

    Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit


    Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Norvell Webster Crump, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Norvell Webster Crump appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for a reduction to his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
    3582(c)(2) (2000).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See United States v. Crump, Nos. CR-94-101; CA-01969 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 21, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like