Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Scott, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Albert Manning Scott, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with its reasoning as outlined in United States v. Scott, No. CR-89-186 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2002). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-02-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7734

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Albert Manning Scott, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with its reasoning as outlined in United States v. Scott, No. CR-89-186 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2002). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Scott, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Albert Manning Scott, Sr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with its reasoning as outlined in United States v. Scott, No. CR-89-186 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2002). The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7734

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ALBERT MANNING SCOTT, SR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-89-186)

    Submitted:

    January 30, 2003

    Decided:

    February 5, 2003

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Albert Manning Scott, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Richard Stanley
    Glaser, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Albert Manning Scott, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    adopting the magistrate judges recommendation to deny relief on
    Scotts motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2)
    (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See


    United States v. Scott, No. CR-89-186 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2002). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like