Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Albert D. Tillery v. Joseph Mesics, Public Defender Gerald H. McClellan Warden, 974 F.2d 1332, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Albert D. Tillery under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-09-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 974 F.2d 1332 Docket: 91-6555

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Albert D. Tillery under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Albert D. Tillery v. Joseph Mesics, Public Defender Gerald H. McClellan Warden, 974 F.2d 1332, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Albert D. Tillery under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    974 F.

    2d 1332

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Albert D. TILLERY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Joseph MESICS, Public Defender; Gerald H. McClellan,
    Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 91-6555.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 30, 1991
    Decided: September 1, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-91-446-MJG)
    Albert Donald Tillery, Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    Affirmed.
    Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    Albert D. Tillery appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Tillery v. Mesics, No. CA-91-446-MJG (D. Md.

    Mar. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like