Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dove v. NC State Credit, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Anthony Dove filed a civil action against various defendants which was dismissed by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court's order dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-01-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6836

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Anthony Dove filed a civil action against various defendants which was dismissed by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court's order dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    Dove v. NC State Credit, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Anthony Dove filed a civil action against various defendants which was dismissed by the district court. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court's order dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6836

    ANTHONY DOVE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION;
    NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
    CREDIT UNION; LYNN EUBANKS; SID PHILLIPS;
    CHRISTOPHER C. HILL, Detective; LENOIR COUNTY
    SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; LENOIR COUNTY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-02-25-4-H)

    Submitted:

    October 9, 2002

    Decided:

    January 8, 2003

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Dove,
    Mark Herring,
    Allen Davis,
    Carolina, for

    Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Scott Sullivan, Jonathan


    WHITE & ALLEN, P.A., Kinston, North Carolina; Mark
    WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Dove appeals the district courts order dismissing his
    civil action against Defendants.
    find no reversible error.
    of the district court.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

    See Dove v. North Carolina State Employees

    Credit Union, No. CA-02-25-4-H (E.D.N.C. May 15, 2002). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like