Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anderson v. Garbage Disposal, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Edward Anderson's state law claims and grant of summary judgment to defendants on his Title VII claim of employment discrimination. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had dismissed the state law claims and granted summary judgment to defendants on the Title VII claim. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1189

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Edward Anderson's state law claims and grant of summary judgment to defendants on his Title VII claim of employment discrimination. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had dismissed the state law claims and granted summary judgment to defendants on the Title VII claim. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Anderson v. Garbage Disposal, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Edward Anderson's state law claims and grant of summary judgment to defendants on his Title VII claim of employment discrimination. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had dismissed the state law claims and granted summary judgment to defendants on the Title VII claim. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1189

    EDWARD ANDERSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GARBAGE DISPOSAL SERVICE; REPUBLIC SERVICES,
    INCORPORATED; DAVE BAVACQUA; FRANK ROCCO;
    ELIJAH SHAW; LEVINE PROPERTIES,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-00-294-MU)

    Submitted:

    May 31, 2001

    Decided:

    June 6, 2001

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Edward Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Tighe Bartis, PARKER,
    POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, Raleigh, North Carolina; Keith Michael
    Weddington, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, L.L.P., Charlotte,
    North Carolina; John Robert Buric, JAMES, MCELROY & DIEHL, P.A.,
    Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward Anderson appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his various state law claims and granting summary judgment to the
    Defendants on his claim under his Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. 2000e
    to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.


    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Anderson v. Garbage Disposal Serv., No. CA-00-294-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan.
    5, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like