Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Adkins v. Decoco, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Michael Adkins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three doctors which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Adkins appealed the dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6428

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Adkins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three doctors which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Adkins appealed the dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Adkins v. Decoco, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Adkins filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three doctors which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. Adkins appealed the dismissal. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6428

    MICHAEL ADKINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR DECOCO, Doctor of Psychiatry; DOCTOR
    HARRIS, Doctor of Psychologist; DOCTOR BOND,
    Doctor of Psychologist,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (CA-05-118-2)

    Submitted:

    June 23, 2005

    Decided:

    June 30, 2005

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Adkins

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See Adkins v. Decoco, No. CA-05-118-2 (E.D. Va. filed

    March 17, 2005 & entered March 21, 2005).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like