Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bens v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court denied Wendy Bens' habeas corpus action that was brought under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court had denied the habeas action for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore denied Bens' request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the case for the same reasons provided by the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6002

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court denied Wendy Bens' habeas corpus action that was brought under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court had denied the habeas action for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore denied Bens' request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the case for the same reasons provided by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Bens v. United States, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court denied Wendy Bens' habeas corpus action that was brought under Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court had denied the habeas action for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore denied Bens' request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the case for the same reasons provided by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6002

    WENDY BENS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William D. Quarles, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:09-cv-03050-WDQ)

    Submitted:

    October 19, 2010

    Decided:

    October 26, 2010

    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wendy Bens, Appellant Pro Se.


    Joshua L. Kaul, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wendy Bens appeals the district courts order denying
    his habeas corpus action brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 17.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    Accordingly,

    we

    the

    deny

    record
    leave

    and

    to

    find

    proceed

    no
    in

    reversible
    forma

    error.

    pauperis

    dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Bens v.

    United States, No. 1:09-cv-03050-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 10, 2009).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like