Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gibson, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lewis Dean Gibson's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the ruling for the reasons stated by the district court in its November 7, 2008 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8408

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lewis Dean Gibson's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the ruling for the reasons stated by the district court in its November 7, 2008 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Gibson, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lewis Dean Gibson's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the ruling for the reasons stated by the district court in its November 7, 2008 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8408

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LEWIS DEAN GIBSON, a/k/a Sld Dft 3, a/k/a Dean Forney,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
    Lacy H. Thornburg,
    District Judge. (1:97-cr-00310-LHT-3)

    Submitted:

    March 17, 2009

    Decided:

    March 24, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Chiege O. Kalu Okwara, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.


    Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States
    Attorneys, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lewis Dean Gibson appeals the district courts order
    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006) motion.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Gibson, No. 1:97-cr-00310-LHT-3 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2008).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like