Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Leftwich, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Charles Leftwich appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Leftwich's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its January 24, 2001 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6243

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Leftwich appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Leftwich's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its January 24, 2001 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Leftwich, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Leftwich appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Leftwich's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its January 24, 2001 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6243

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CHARLES A. LEFTWICH,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-99-76-F, CA-00-863-5-F)

    Submitted:

    April 3, 2001

    Decided:

    April 23, 2001

    Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles A. Leftwich, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart G. Baker, Office of
    the Staff Judge Advocate, UNITED STATES ARMY, Fort Bragg, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles A. Leftwich seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Leftwich, Nos. CR-99-76-

    F; CA-00-863-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like