Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Jaime Traverso Sr. appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-08-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 883 F.2d 70 Docket: 89-6634

    Original Title

    Jaime Traverso, Sr. v. Edward W. Murray, James M. Sisk, William P. Rogers, Thomas R. Israel, George Harden, Larry W. Jarvis, 883 F.2d 70, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Jaime Traverso Sr. appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Jaime Traverso Sr. appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    883 F.

    2d 70
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Jaime TRAVERSO, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward W. MURRAY, James M. Sisk, William P. Rogers,
    Thomas
    R. Israel, George Harden, Larry W. Jarvis,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-6634.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 30, 1989.
    Decided Aug. 14, 1989.

    Jaime Traverso, Sr., appellant pro se.


    Mark Ralph Davis, (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for
    appellees.
    Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Jaime Traverso, Sr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Traverso v. Murray, C/A No. 88-112-H
    (W.D.Va. Apr. 17, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like