Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jerome Yarn, Jr. v. Sgt. Hudson Officer Burgess, 873 F.2d 1442, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Jerome Yarn Jr. filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against two defendants, Sgt. Hudson and Officer Burgess, which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Yarn's appeal. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-04-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 873 F.2d 1442 Docket: 89-7027

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Jerome Yarn Jr. filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against two defendants, Sgt. Hudson and Officer Burgess, which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Yarn's appeal. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    Jerome Yarn, Jr. v. Sgt. Hudson Officer Burgess, 873 F.2d 1442, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Jerome Yarn Jr. filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against two defendants, Sgt. Hudson and Officer Burgess, which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Yarn's appeal. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    873 F.

    2d 1442
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Jerome YARN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Sgt. HUDSON; Officer Burgess, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-7027.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: March 20, 1989.
    Decided: April 10, 1989.

    Jerome Yarn, Jr., appellant pro se.


    LaVee Hamer Jackson (Office of the Attorney General), for appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Jerome Yarn, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Yarn v. Hudson, C/A No. 88-4-CRT (E.D.N.C.
    Jan. 5, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like