Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Becker v. Lippy, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Sharon Becker filed a § 1983 complaint against two police officers which was denied by the district court. Becker appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors, so they affirmed the district court's ruling to deny relief on Becker's § 1983 complaint against the two police officers. The appeals court did not require oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-12-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-2184

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Sharon Becker filed a § 1983 complaint against two police officers which was denied by the district court. Becker appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors, so they affirmed the district court's ruling to deny relief on Becker's § 1983 complaint against the two police officers. The appeals court did not require oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Becker v. Lippy, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sharon Becker filed a § 1983 complaint against two police officers which was denied by the district court. Becker appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors, so they affirmed the district court's ruling to deny relief on Becker's § 1983 complaint against the two police officers. The appeals court did not require oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-2184

    SHARON PHYLLIS BECKER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARTY LIPPY, Officer; DEBRA MILHOLEN, Detective,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-98-331-JFM)

    Submitted:

    November 19, 1998

    Decided:

    December 1, 1998

    Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Sharon Phyllis Becker, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Grant Cook, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sharon Phyllis Becker appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. See Becker v. Lippy, No. CA-98-331-JFM (D.
    Md. Apr. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like