Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Huffma, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Chauncey A. Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had dismissed Williams' complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 098063

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Chauncey A. Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had dismissed Williams' complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Williams v. Huffma, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Chauncey A. Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had dismissed Williams' complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8063

    CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    L. W. HUFFMAN, Regional Director (D.A.); BRAXTON, Warden;
    T. A. SPANGLER, Correctional Officer,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:09-cv-00222-sgw-mfu)

    Submitted:

    March 16, 2010

    Decided:

    March 23, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Chauncey A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Chauncey

    A.

    Williams

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28


    U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2006).
    no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Williams v. Huffman, No. 7:09-cv-

    00222-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Oct. 16, 2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like