Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Jabe, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Chauncey Williams filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against officials at the Augusta Correctional Center. The district court denied relief, and Williams appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6099

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Chauncey Williams filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against officials at the Augusta Correctional Center. The district court denied relief, and Williams appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Williams v. Jabe, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Chauncey Williams filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against officials at the Augusta Correctional Center. The district court denied relief, and Williams appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6099

    CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN M. JABE, Deputy Director; DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden
    (A.C.C.); TRACY LAWHORN, Treatment Supervisor (A.C.C.);
    THOMAS SIMMONS, Chaplain (A.C.C.); LIEUTENANT HARDEN, Shift
    Commander (A.C.C.); SERGEANT TINCHER (A.C.C.),
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:08-cv-00061-sgw-mfu)

    Submitted:

    July 23, 2009

    Decided:

    July 29, 2009

    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Chauncey A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.


    Mark R. Davis,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Chauncey

    A.

    Williams

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    Williams v. Jabe, No. 7:08-cv-00061-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va.

    court.

    Dec. 31, 2008).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like