Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Paylor v. Sutton, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Reginald Paylor appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to defendants in Paylor's § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-11-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7342

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Reginald Paylor appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to defendants in Paylor's § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Paylor v. Sutton, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Reginald Paylor appealed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to defendants in Paylor's § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appellate court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7342

    REGINALD E. PAYLOR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ERNEST SUTTON, Superintendent; JAY MARROW,
    Medical
    Administrator;
    MICHAEL
    BAKER,
    Administrative Officer; DAVID ONEIL, Clothes
    House Officer; SIVARA MANICKAVASAGAR, Doctor,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-507-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    November 6, 2003

    Decided:

    November 20, 2003

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Reginald E. Paylor, Appellant Pro Se.


    Deborrah Lynn Newton,
    Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; John Walton
    Minier, YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM
    Reginald Paylor appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment in favor of the Defendants and dismissing Paylors
    action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000).

    We have reviewed

    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for


    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Paylor v. Sutton,

    No. CA-02-507-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2003). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like