Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Nagy, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Paul Nagy appealed the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's order and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial based on the reasoning in the district court's order, which found no grounds to grant Nagy's Rule 60(b) motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-06-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6149

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Paul Nagy appealed the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's order and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial based on the reasoning in the district court's order, which found no grounds to grant Nagy's Rule 60(b) motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Nagy, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Paul Nagy appealed the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's order and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial based on the reasoning in the district court's order, which found no grounds to grant Nagy's Rule 60(b) motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6149

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    PAUL NAGY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-951-5-BO-2)

    Submitted:

    May 31, 2001

    Decided:

    June 8, 2001

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se. Michael David Bredenberg, Jerri Ulrica
    Dunston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul Nagy appeals the district courts order denying his Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts order and find no reversible error.


    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we
    United States v.

    Nagy, No. CA-98-951-5-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 13, 2000; entered


    Dec. 14, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like