Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Paul, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Tobaris Anibal Paul's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Paul's § 2255 motion in an order dated July 17, 2001. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7413

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Tobaris Anibal Paul's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Paul's § 2255 motion in an order dated July 17, 2001. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Paul, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Tobaris Anibal Paul's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Paul's § 2255 motion in an order dated July 17, 2001. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7413

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    TOBARIS ANIBAL PAUL, a/k/a Big Shot, a/k/a
    Shot,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District
    Judge. (CR-97-9-4, CA-99-120-4)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2001

    Decided:

    January 2, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Tobaris Anibal Paul, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tobaris Anibal Paul seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court. See United States v. Paul, Nos. CR-97-9-4; CA99-120-4 (E.D. Va. dated July 17, 2001, entered July 18, 2001).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like