Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Nagy, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Paul Nagy appealed the denial of his motion for free transcripts from a previous case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial. It affirmed the district court's ruling denying Nagy's motion for free transcripts for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6421

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Paul Nagy appealed the denial of his motion for free transcripts from a previous case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial. It affirmed the district court's ruling denying Nagy's motion for free transcripts for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Nagy, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Paul Nagy appealed the denial of his motion for free transcripts from a previous case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial. It affirmed the district court's ruling denying Nagy's motion for free transcripts for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6421

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    PAUL NAGY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (5:98-hc-00951-BR)

    Submitted:

    June 15, 2007

    Decided:

    June 25, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant.


    Michael David Bredenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul Nagy appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion for free transcripts.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court. United States v. Nagy, No. 5:98-hc-00951-BR
    (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like