Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Cabe, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Johnny Cabe appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Cabe's motion for a new trial based on the reasons stated by the district court in its June 21, 2005 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-12-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7117

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Johnny Cabe appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Cabe's motion for a new trial based on the reasons stated by the district court in its June 21, 2005 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Cabe, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Johnny Cabe appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Cabe's motion for a new trial based on the reasons stated by the district court in its June 21, 2005 decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7117

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JOHNNY WILLIAM CABE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (CR-00-301)

    Submitted:

    December 9, 2005

    Decided:

    December 20, 2005

    Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Johnny William Cabe, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger,


    Anne Hunter Young, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia,
    South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Johnny William Cabe, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant
    to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    See United States v. Cabe, No. CR-00-301

    (D.S.C. June 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like