Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wemmering, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Crystal Dawn Wemmering's motions for recusal and a new trial. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Wemmering's post-conviction motions for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6464

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Crystal Dawn Wemmering's motions for recusal and a new trial. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Wemmering's post-conviction motions for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    20 views2 pages

    United States v. Wemmering, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Crystal Dawn Wemmering's motions for recusal and a new trial. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Wemmering's post-conviction motions for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appellate panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6464

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CRYSTAL DAWN WEMMERING,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (5:04-cr-00347-F-3)

    Submitted:

    June 1, 2010

    Decided:

    June 4, 2010

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Deborrah Lynn Newton, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.


    Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Crystal

    Dawn

    Wemmering

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying her motions for recusal and for a new trial.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.
    (E.D.N.C.

    United
    Feb.

    States
    27,

    v.

    2009).

    Wemmering,
    We

    No.

    dispense

    5:04-cr-00347-F-3

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like