Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gomez, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Sebastian Gomez's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion for clarification and reconsideration. The three-judge panel affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons provided by the district court in its denial. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-07-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6119

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Sebastian Gomez's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion for clarification and reconsideration. The three-judge panel affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons provided by the district court in its denial. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Gomez, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Sebastian Gomez's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion for clarification and reconsideration. The three-judge panel affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The panel reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons provided by the district court in its denial. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6119

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SEBASTIAN GOMEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (CR-96-806)

    Submitted:

    June 9, 2004

    Decided:

    July 14, 2004

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sebastian Gomez, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE


    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sebastian

    Gomez

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for clarification and for reconsideration.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    See United States v. Gomez, No. CR-96-806 (D.S.C. filed

    Dec. 17, 2003 & entered Dec. 18, 2003).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like