Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Miller v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case from 2004. Karenazo Miller appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-05-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7965

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case from 2004. Karenazo Miller appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Miller v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case from 2004. Karenazo Miller appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7965

    KARENAZO MILLER, a/k/a Deshaun Bostic,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; A. F. BEELER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-04-715-H)

    Submitted:

    May 12, 2005

    Decided:

    May 17, 2005

    Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Karenazo Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Karenazo

    Miller

    appeals

    the

    district

    dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) motion.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. See Miller v. United States, No. CA-04-715-H (E.D.N.C. Oct.


    28, 2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like