Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • King v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Darrick Lamonte King under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Juanita Baker, Mary Harrop, and Karen Pardue. The district court denied relief to King, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied a pending motion for relief from King.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-08-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6565

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Darrick Lamonte King under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Juanita Baker, Mary Harrop, and Karen Pardue. The district court denied relief to King, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied a pending motion for relief from King.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    King v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Darrick Lamonte King under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Juanita Baker, Mary Harrop, and Karen Pardue. The district court denied relief to King, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied a pending motion for relief from King.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6565

    DARRICK LAMONTE KING,


    Plaintiff -

    Appellant,

    versus
    JUANITA BAKER; MARY HARROP; KAREN PARDUE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-825-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    August 12, 2004

    Decided:

    August 18, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Darrick Lamonte King, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH
    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Darrick Lamonte King appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See King v.

    Baker, No. CA-01-825-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 2, 2004 & entered


    Mar. 3, 2004).

    We deny Kings pending motion for relief.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like