Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Parker v. Homestead Studio, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Sara Parker appealed a district court's dismissal of her housing discrimination case against Homestead Studio Suites Hotel based on the principle of res judicata. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the same reasons stated in that court's ruling, which found the case was barred by a previous judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-08-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-1628

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Sara Parker appealed a district court's dismissal of her housing discrimination case against Homestead Studio Suites Hotel based on the principle of res judicata. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the same reasons stated in that court's ruling, which found the case was barred by a previous judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Parker v. Homestead Studio, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sara Parker appealed a district court's dismissal of her housing discrimination case against Homestead Studio Suites Hotel based on the principle of res judicata. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the same reasons stated in that court's ruling, which found the case was barred by a previous judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-1628

    SARA E. PARKER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HOMESTEAD STUDIO SUITES HOTEL,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-05-69-5)

    Submitted:

    August 18, 2005

    Decided:

    August 23, 2005

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Sara E. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Brian David Darer, PARKER, POE,
    ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sara

    E.

    Parker

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing her housing discrimination action based on res judicata.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court. See Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel, No. CA-05-69-5
    (E.D.N.C. May 13, 2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like