Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Parker v. David Venable, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William S. Parker's appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found Parker's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed it for the same reasons stated by the district court in case number 5:12-ct-03107-D. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-05-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6031

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William S. Parker's appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found Parker's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed it for the same reasons stated by the district court in case number 5:12-ct-03107-D. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    William Parker v. David Venable, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William S. Parker's appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit found Parker's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed it for the same reasons stated by the district court in case number 5:12-ct-03107-D. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6031

    WILLIAM S. PARKER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DAVID VENABLE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever III,
    Chief District Judge. (5:12-ct-03107-D)

    Submitted:

    May 23, 2013

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    AGEE,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    May 28, 2013

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William S. Parker, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William S. Parker appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915A(b) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and find that

    this appeal is frivolous.


    for

    the

    reasons

    Venable,

    No.

    dispense

    with

    contentions

    stated

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal


    by

    the

    5:12-ct-03107-D

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    district

    (E.D.N.C.
    because

    presented

    in

    court.

    Nov.
    the
    the

    Parker

    v.

    28,

    2012).

    We

    facts

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like