Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Walker v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Darrius Lamont Walker's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Walker, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Walker's petition for the reasons stated. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7871

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Darrius Lamont Walker's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Walker, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Walker's petition for the reasons stated. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Walker v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Darrius Lamont Walker's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Walker, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Walker's petition for the reasons stated. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7871

    DARRIUS LAMONT WALKER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-05-499-5-H)

    Submitted: June 22, 2006

    Decided: June 26, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Darrius Lamont Walker, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Darrius Lamont Walker, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241
    (2000)

    petition.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    Walker v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-499-5-H

    (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like