Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thomas v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maleake Thomas's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-08-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6800

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maleake Thomas's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Thomas v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maleake Thomas's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6800

    MALEAKE THOMAS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CR-93-36, CA-99-39-H)

    Submitted:

    August 19, 1999

    Decided:

    August 26, 1999

    Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Maleake Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. David Paul Folmar, Jr., Assistant
    United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Maleake Thomas appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).*

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court. See Thomas v. United States, Nos. CR-93-36; CA-9939-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    While Appellant styled his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.


    2241, we find that the district court properly construed the motion
    under 2255.
    2

    You might also like