Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Thomas, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Maleake Thomas's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. In reviewing the record, the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court of Appeals therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6316

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Maleake Thomas's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. In reviewing the record, the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court of Appeals therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Thomas, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Maleake Thomas's appeal of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. In reviewing the record, the Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court of Appeals therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6316

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MALEAKE THOMAS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CR-93-36-H, CA-95-131-H)
    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    June 6, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Maleake Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. David Paul Folmar, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
    the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas, Nos.
    CR-93-36-H; CA-95-131-H (E.D.N.C., Feb. 1, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like