Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Smitherman v. Neuse Correctional, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Ronald Smitherman filed a § 1983 complaint against Neuse Correctional Institute which was denied by the district court. Smitherman appealed. In a brief unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6444

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronald Smitherman filed a § 1983 complaint against Neuse Correctional Institute which was denied by the district court. Smitherman appealed. In a brief unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Smitherman v. Neuse Correctional, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronald Smitherman filed a § 1983 complaint against Neuse Correctional Institute which was denied by the district court. Smitherman appealed. In a brief unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6444

    RONALD SMITHERMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NEUSE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-96-133-5-F)
    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    June 6, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ronald Smitherman, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Smitherman v. Neuse Correctional Institute, No. CA-96-133-5F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like