Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kakert v. Darden Restaurants, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Chad Kakert's civil action against Darden Restaurants for failure to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its May 16, 2003 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-07-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-1691

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Chad Kakert's civil action against Darden Restaurants for failure to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its May 16, 2003 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Kakert v. Darden Restaurants, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Chad Kakert's civil action against Darden Restaurants for failure to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its May 16, 2003 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-1691

    CHAD E. KAKERT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-03-297-7)

    Submitted:

    July 10, 2003

    Decided:

    July 15, 2003

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Chad E. Kakert, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Chad E. Kakert appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his civil action against Darden Restaurants for failure to state a
    claim on which relief may be granted.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    See Kakert v. Darden

    Restaurants, Inc., No. CA-03-297-7 (W.D. Va. May 16, 2003).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like