Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • DeAndrew Carter v. United States, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    DeAndrew Carter, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit granted Carter in forma pauperis status but affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Carter's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6114

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    DeAndrew Carter, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit granted Carter in forma pauperis status but affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Carter's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    DeAndrew Carter v. United States, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    DeAndrew Carter, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit granted Carter in forma pauperis status but affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Carter's petition. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6114

    DEANDREW LAMONT CARTER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:14-cv-00477-HEH)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 2015

    Decided:

    June 22, 2015

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    DeAndrew Lamont Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    DeAndrew

    Lamont

    Carter,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241


    (2012)

    petition.

    reversible

    error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    Accordingly,

    the

    although

    record
    we

    and

    grant

    find

    no

    leave

    to

    proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    Carter v. United States, No. 3:14-cv-00477-

    HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2014).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like